<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Concerned about ethics in the media? Join the People&#8217;s Republic of South Devon. Writers, artists, photographers wanted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peoplesrepublicofsouthdevon.co.uk/2009/10/28/concerned-about-ethics-in-the-media-join-the-peoples-republic-of-south-devon-writers-artists-photographers-wanted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peoplesrepublicofsouthdevon.co.uk/2009/10/28/concerned-about-ethics-in-the-media-join-the-peoples-republic-of-south-devon-writers-artists-photographers-wanted/</link>
	<description>The People&#039;s Republic of South Devon is a left-leaning magazine that champions lesser covered local news along with national and global issues. We value diversity, equality, participation and solidarity.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:11:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.peoplesrepublicofsouthdevon.co.uk/2009/10/28/concerned-about-ethics-in-the-media-join-the-peoples-republic-of-south-devon-writers-artists-photographers-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-131506</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peoplesrepublicofsouthdevon.co.uk/?p=8168#comment-131506</guid>
		<description>&#039;Even the matter of food critics shooting baboons seems pretty cut and dry (not the Daily Mail this time!).&#039;

Is that AA Gill coming over the hill with a rifle, ready for a Totnes shoot out.  I think some will have to buy the Baboons their own Duck House for their own protection via the fees office!

Think I might just turn the oven on....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Even the matter of food critics shooting baboons seems pretty cut and dry (not the Daily Mail this time!).&#8217;</p>
<p>Is that AA Gill coming over the hill with a rifle, ready for a Totnes shoot out.  I think some will have to buy the Baboons their own Duck House for their own protection via the fees office!</p>
<p>Think I might just turn the oven on&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.peoplesrepublicofsouthdevon.co.uk/2009/10/28/concerned-about-ethics-in-the-media-join-the-peoples-republic-of-south-devon-writers-artists-photographers-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-131363</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peoplesrepublicofsouthdevon.co.uk/?p=8168#comment-131363</guid>
		<description>While I agree with Nick that there can be some muddying of traditional right/left issues, surely there are some &#039;ethics&#039; we can all agree on. 

Doctoring images to twist the Question Time story (that would be the Daily Mail), or Jan Moir spewing hateful homophobia (Daily Mail again), or falsely accusing a police commander of being a bigamist (Daily Mail), or falsely claiming Oliver Twist beat up his ex-wife (Daily Mail)... 

Even the matter of food critics shooting baboons seems pretty cut and dry (not the Daily Mail this time!). 

I&#039;d say it&#039;s not really a question of ‘if I say it is so, then I must be ethical&#039; - it&#039;s more to do with aspiring to &#039;be better&#039; and holding yourself to account.

Of course, Charles Foster Kane had exactly the same declaration of principles and look how that turned out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with Nick that there can be some muddying of traditional right/left issues, surely there are some &#8216;ethics&#8217; we can all agree on. </p>
<p>Doctoring images to twist the Question Time story (that would be the Daily Mail), or Jan Moir spewing hateful homophobia (Daily Mail again), or falsely accusing a police commander of being a bigamist (Daily Mail), or falsely claiming Oliver Twist beat up his ex-wife (Daily Mail)&#8230; </p>
<p>Even the matter of food critics shooting baboons seems pretty cut and dry (not the Daily Mail this time!). </p>
<p>I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s not really a question of ‘if I say it is so, then I must be ethical&#8217; &#8211; it&#8217;s more to do with aspiring to &#8216;be better&#8217; and holding yourself to account.</p>
<p>Of course, Charles Foster Kane had exactly the same declaration of principles and look how that turned out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.peoplesrepublicofsouthdevon.co.uk/2009/10/28/concerned-about-ethics-in-the-media-join-the-peoples-republic-of-south-devon-writers-artists-photographers-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-131327</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peoplesrepublicofsouthdevon.co.uk/?p=8168#comment-131327</guid>
		<description>Ethics tend to be a very muddy ground. Even if your bouncing both left and right or reading John Grey&#039;s Enlightenment&#039;s Wake. One of those cases where everybody thinks they are right and everybody else is wrong, as in PMQ&#039;s every week. In fact it has got to a point in both our politics and the media of all forms, where the only arguement tends to be - &#039;if I say it is so,&#039; then I must be ethical. Therefore, where is one to go from here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethics tend to be a very muddy ground. Even if your bouncing both left and right or reading John Grey&#8217;s Enlightenment&#8217;s Wake. One of those cases where everybody thinks they are right and everybody else is wrong, as in PMQ&#8217;s every week. In fact it has got to a point in both our politics and the media of all forms, where the only arguement tends to be &#8211; &#8216;if I say it is so,&#8217; then I must be ethical. Therefore, where is one to go from here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

