Who-are-ya!? Low-key EU appointments mean a win for Euro-sceptics, says South West MEP

News of the appointment of Belgian President Herman Van Rompuy as the first ‘President of Europe’ and Trade Commissioner Baroness Ashton as his ‘Foreign Secretary’ seems to have been greeted with widespread disbelief. The public reaction when their names were announced was a mystified “Who?” , writes South West Conservative MEP Giles Chichester.

However, the reality behind these appointments is the reluctance of the European Council to be seen to be moving towards a European federal state.

The appointment of high-profile politicians to these positions would have confirmed to the ultra-eurosceptics that the Lisbon Treaty was indeed the next step towards creating a European federal superstate.

The fact is that Sarkozy, Merkle and the other EU heads of government are not at the moment prepared to tolerate their positions as European leaders being challenged and usurped by a populist EU President with a significant international reputation for charisma.

As things stand, this latest EU stitch up should give comfort to the eurosceptics that, for the time being, the nation state still holds sway over the superstate. But we should stay vigilant.

Giles Chichester MEP
Conservative MEP for South West England and Gibraltar

(image: Herman Van Rompuy)



book a hotel in Devon Come and enjoy Devon – book a hotel and get away!




Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Related posts:

  1. Embrace waste-to-energy plants as renewable and forget the notion of ‘incineration’, says South West MEP Giles Chichester South West MEP Giles Chichester, Conservative Energy Spokesman in the...
  2. Meat is… political suicide. South West MEP Giles Chichester assesses Graham Watson’s anti-meat stance South West MEPs can get at each other's throats, but...
  3. South West Forum to discuss the ‘big society’ at Exeter Uni South West MEP Giles Chichester is going along to meeting...
Comments have been disabled for this post.
Sort: Newest | Oldest

... or the 'President'was never intended to be a new Napoleon/Hitler/Stalin figure bent on destroying liberty... and was always just a Chairperson with a limited and quite unexciting remit?